This standard is about developing viable designs to brief. It involves discussing the design brief with the relevant people and identifying the parameters and the technical implications.
It is also about the initial part of the design process and the development of ideas from a design brief or a non-pictorial script.
It can be about adapting existing design options and design economies that are consistent with the brief or developing alternative options that show potential.
Performance criteria
You must be able to:
identify design options which are technically feasible and meet the parameters of the brief, the budget, the schedule and the skills of the people available
consider environmental impact and sustainability of design options
identify new and innovative design solutions and approaches when initial selections are not sufficient
discuss selected design options with relevant people and note their observations
develop design options which have the greatest potential for success
evaluate design options against significant parameters of the design brief to ensure they are technically feasible and meet design parameters
present evaluations and feasible design options to assist decision makers
assess changes to the design brief and make recommendations when it is not possible to produce one solution that meets all requirements of the brief,
assess the implications of modifying the design brief and record the outcomes
present assessments, conclusions, and recommendations to promote understanding and acceptance
Knowledge and understanding
You need to know and understand:
the parameters of the brief, the budget, the schedule and the skills of the people available
different sources of new and existing design options
how to specify design options that show potential
the benefits and uses of design bibles, colour palettes and design aesthetics
how to identify, assess and select new and existing design options consistent with the brief
how to present evaluation results and feasible design options to assist selection by decision makers
when to respect the parameters of the design brief and when to question them
how to work effectively within a constrained budget or schedule K10 the value of other people's ideas, and how to use them when appropriate
the role of department leads clients and directors in decision making
the types of evaluation for testing design solutions
why it is important to have a “lock off point” after which changes cannot be made
different methods of data presentation
requirements for recording the options selected and any modifications made
why it is important to provide opportunities to others to ask questions and seek clarification
Overview
This standard is about developing viable designs to brief. It involves discussing the design brief with the relevant people and identifying the parameters and the technical implications.
It is also about the initial part of the design process and the development of ideas from a design brief or a non-pictorial script.
It can be about adapting existing design options and design economies that are consistent with the brief or developing alternative options that show potential.
Performance criteria
You must be able to:
Knowledge and understanding
You need to know and understand: